Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

the independent debate

Has Rachel Reeves got the balance right in her first spending review? Join The Independent Debate

Rachel Reeves’ first multi-year spending review as chancellor delivers major investment pledges in health, housing and infrastructure, but critics have raised questions and warn that ‘sharp trade-offs are unavoidable’

Wednesday 11 June 2025 13:17 BST
Comments
Reeves said the spending review reflects the ‘priorities of working people’
Reeves said the spending review reflects the ‘priorities of working people’ (PA Wire)

With the dust barely settled on Rachel Reeves’ first major spending review since Labour’s return to power, debate is already raging over the scale, shape, and consequences of the chancellor’s plans.

Unveiled to MPs at 12.30pm today, Reeves’ review promises sweeping investment in the NHS, affordable housing, transport and nuclear energy – all under the banner of what she calls “Britain’s renewal.”

Among the pledges: £30bn for the NHS, £39bn for social and affordable housing, £14.2bn for nuclear, and billions more for AI and public transport in the North and Midlands.

Supporters of the review argue it strikes a necessary balance between fiscal discipline and public investment. Reeves herself insists it will “make working people better off” without raising taxes or borrowing for day-to-day spending.

Others, such as senior economists in Labour’s policy circle, have welcomed the focus on infrastructure and science as critical to long-term growth.

But critics are already lining up. Police chiefs, including Sir Mark Rowley, the head of the Metropolitan Police, have warned of “far-reaching consequences” if budget squeezes lead to a drop in frontline policing.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner reportedly resisted signing off on spending cuts until the final hours, fearing damage to border control, housing and social care.

Outside Whitehall, London Mayor Sadiq Khan has accused the government of reviving an “anti-London agenda” by neglecting the capital’s transport needs. And the Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned bluntly that “sharp trade-offs are unavoidable” — with many departments bracing for stealth austerity.

So what do you think? Has Rachel Reeves delivered a spending review that invests wisely in Britain’s future? Or is Labour already falling short of the promises it made just weeks ago?

We want to hear from you. Share your thoughts on Rachel Reeves’ spending review in the comments and vote in the poll below – we’ll feature the most compelling responses and discuss the results in the coming days.

All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can take part in the debate. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in